This blog post provides an overall content outline for my rhetorical investigation project.
Author Response: Outline
of Podcast
·
Opening Section (introduction)
o
Introduce who I am
o
Music to grab attention
o
Give catchy title of podcast to grab attention
o
Brief summary: How do professionals in the
pharmaceutical field create or author texts?
·
Body Sections
o
(1) Introduction of topic through (x2) interviews
(include snippets of each interview)
§
Main Idea: Explore Academic Journalsàpre-production,
production, post-production of the creation process
·
Evidence: Slack “…very structured…” Proves/Importance- Creating texts
within science (pharmacy)=formula. Important information pertaining to “how”
professors in my field create texts.
·
Evidence: Chapman “…contains an abstract…”
Proves/Importance- A breakdown
of the components of an academic journal as well as the publication process.
Important to understanding production & post-production.
o
(2) Dive deeper into interview points
§
Main Idea: Methodology of constructing Academic
Journals, and the drawbacks/benefits of the process.
·
Evidence: Slack describes the process as an “on
the job learning experience” and that her background didn’t really prepare her.
Explain why.
Proves/Importance: Identifies
the learning experience of creation.
·
Evidence: Chapman describes the difficulties
working with students, as well as the “citation number”
Proves/Importance: Helpful in
understanding the process as a whole from start to finish, and not just the
piece itself.
o
(3) Sample analysis of academic journal
§
Main Idea: To breakdown a real academic journal
and to analyze the different components in regards to rhetorical strategies.
·
Evidence: Analyze each of the professor’s
academic journals. Identity similarities/differences within each.
Proves/Importance: Helps to
identify any relationships between the structure of each journal and the
overall genre.
·
Evidence: Analyze the rhetorical strategies such
as credibility, logic, and emotion.
·
Proves/Importance:
Creates a better understanding of the piece as a whole by figuring out the
rhetorical strategies that were used to convey the overall purpose/message.
·
Closing
o
Bring each of the body paragraphs together in a
single coherent summary. Discuss the importance of understanding the writing
process in the pharmaceutical field, and mention any information that I found
interesting or daunting.
Larger Significance?
To explain the larger significance
of the subject matter I will (1) discuss the specific implications that can be
drawn from an academic journal, and (2) why the specific writing process is
important/necessary to relay academic information.
Writing in any scientific field is
tricky, therefore, it is important to produce the findings/observations/data in
a very specific and easy to retract manner. In essence, the purpose of this
project is to determine the methodology employed to produce an academic
journal.
Looks good as an evolving plan. It does seem like some things are still ambiguous here - for example, which specific conventions will you be examining in the genre examples? What specific rhetorical concepts will you focus on as you examine them?
ReplyDelete