Editorial Report 13A

In this blog post I will still be going over the editorial process for project three. Bare with me. 

1. How did the content change (even slightly - details matter!) when you re-edited it? Why do you think the content is being communicated more effectively in the re-edited version?

When I re-edited it I added a counterargument. I had only briefly touched on the manner before, but after Tuesday's class period I went back and added a stronger counterargument. I think that by addressing and refuting the opposition's side I make my argument even stronger.  

 2. How did the form change (even slightly - details matter!) when you re-edited it? Why do you think the form is presenting the content more effectively in the re-edited version?

The added counterargument section required me to add more pictures. I thought that the pictures regarding those that supported SeaWorld helped to visually present my content/argument in a better way. It at times can be hard to just listen and understand that is why it can be helpful to have visual aids. 

Selection From Rough Cut

Re-Edited Version