Hey peers! In this blog post I have explained some of my thoughts and feelings regarding my rough cut.
Audience Question: What are you anticipating the post-production process to be like, based on what you accomplished during the production phase?
Based on the production phase, I expect the post-production phase to be mainly editorial. Meaning that most of it will be spent making tweaks and changes to the draft in order to get it to the "final" form. However, based on what I accomplished during the production phase I expect this phase to be another week of frustration. The production week just went. It didn't go particularly well or horribly it just simply happened. Therefore, there is a lot of work to be done in order to get my project to perfection.
Author Response
- I would like my peer reviewers to understand that this project is not 100% complete. I still have a lot of work to do before it is in it's final form
- I think that a major issue or weakness of my project would be the genre conventions. I am not sure if the conventions that I used are correct. I am also worried about the actual argument itself. I am not sure if it is as argumentative as it should be.
- I think that the strength of my project lies in the context of it all. I think that the actual material that I am talking about is solid in the sense that I worked hard to gather this information. I spent a lot of time researching the information. I like the story, but it is a matter if it is enough of a public argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment